Prince Harry urged to say answer to drug question in visa application

Prince Harry is urged to reveal how he answered drug question in US visa application

FoI seeks to determine how the Duke of Sussex was allowed to enter the States
He has openly admitting using a variety of illegal substances in the past

Published: 22:01, 1 April 2023 | Updated: 22:01, 1 April 2023

Prince Harry has been urged to be 'totally transparent' and release details of his US visa application or risk becoming a 'political pawn' over his past drug use.

US immigration authorities have until April 12 to respond to a Freedom of Information (FoI) request filed by a leading American think-tank which is seeking to determine how the Duke of Sussex was allowed to enter the States after openly admitting using a variety of substances in the past, including marijuana, cocaine and magic mushrooms.

Under US law, anyone applying for a visa to live and work in America has to tick a box to answer 'yes' or 'no' to the question: 'Are you or have you ever been a drug abuser or addict?'

In his controversial memoir Spare and in a 'therapy session' with toxic trauma expert Dr Gabor Mate to promote his book last month, Harry admitted using psychedelic drugs.

They included the hallucinogenic Amazonian plant ayahuasca, whose effect he described as 'the cleaning of the windshield, the removal of life's filters'.

Prince Harry has been urged to be 'totally transparent' and release details of his US visa application

But under US law, an admission of drug use usually results in a person being denied entry to the States, as happened in the case of chef Nigella Lawson and the late singer Amy Winehouse.

The issue of immigration is expected to become one of the main focuses of the 2024 presidential election, with Republicans attacking President Joe Biden for his lax border controls. And there are fears that Harry's friendships with prominent Democratic Party figures such as former president Barack Obama and major Democratic donors including Oprah Winfrey and Tyler Perry could see him become an 'unwitting pawn in a highly political game'.

Last night, in an exclusive interview with The Mail on Sunday, senior lawyer Samuel Dewey at conservative think-tank the Heritage Foundation, which has filed a 127-page FoI request to see the Duke's application, said: 'It is in the public interest to know how Prince Harry answered the drug question.

'If he has been honest and open about his drug use, and there is no reason to believe he has not been, it could well be that he ticked the "yes" box, in which case he would need a waiver to be granted a visa to be admitted into the States.

'That means he would have had to be interviewed in person and someone would have had to grant him a waiver. We are simply asking who granted that waiver.'

There is a history of authorities releasing immigration documents about public figures.

The US Citizenship and Immigration Services website has an electronic reading room which contains the immigration files of people such as Shyamala Gopalan Harris, mother of US Vice-President Kamala Harris, and George Michael and John Lennon.

Other celebrities whose files are open to the public include Canadian-born Superman actress Margot Kidder and British actress Lynn Redgrave.

In his controversial memoir Spare and in a 'therapy session' with toxic trauma expert Dr Gabor Mate to promote his book last month, Harry admitted using psychedelic drugs

Mr Dewey added: 'An admission of drug use doesn't automatically ban you for ever.

'There is a waiver process and a lot of people get a waiver on a case-by-case basis.

If Prince Harry was given a waiver, who authorised it? Was the correct protocol followed? It's something the American people deserve to know.'

Often a ban is overturned after an in-person interview at a US consulate or official immigration office, where a waiver can be issued.

In 2014, Ms Lawson was prevented from entering the US after admitting during a court case to taking cocaine, even though she told a judge: 'I have never been a drug addict.

I've never been a habitual user.' She was later granted a visa after being interviewed at the US Embassy in London, while Ms Winehouse was twice refused entry because of her drug use.

Mr Dewey said: 'There is no suggestion Prince Harry did anything wrong and, if he was granted a waiver, he may not be aware of any political strings that may have been pulled, if indeed they were. But there is a danger he could become an unwitting pawn in an issue which has become a political hot potato.'

Reports in the US have suggested Harry was admitted on an 'O' visa - given to people of extraordinary ability.

Nile Gardiner, a director of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom at the Heritage Foundation, said: 'This is a much bigger issue than Prince Harry. It is about enforcing immigration law and ensuring that no one is above the law.

Prince Harry is simply the tip of the iceberg.

'There are many who believe that under President Biden immigration laws have become lax and are not being properly implemented. Prince Harry openly talked about his drug use and he has done so for commercial and financial gain, to sell books. In our opinion, there is no case for privacy here.'

The MoS sought comment on Prince Harry's immigration status from the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, US Customs and Border Protection, California Border Patrol and the Sussexes' Archewell organisation.

None responded.