Windsor pub named after Prince Harry has 'skids in bogs and bully …
A pub in Windsor that changed its name to The Prince Harry has left some punters dejected because of "skid marks on the toilets, locals that are bullies and an atmosphere like the moon". A traditional pub "in the heart of Windsor named in honour of our popular Prince," according to the proprietors, the fancy establishment has left a lot to be desired according to some who have visited. Despite having overwhelmingly favourable reviews, The Prince Harry has been on the wrong end of some Tripadvisor feedback of late, with one punter claiming the toilets were "disgusting".
READ MORE: Prince Harry's coronation exit 'not about Archie' as new theory about early dash emerges "The toilets were simply disgusting, they must not have been cleaned all day. There was skids in each toilet, the seat looked wobbly as as for the floor I don't think it has seen a mop in a good while," wrote Elise from Manchester last year.
The Prince Harry has been on the wrong end of some Tripadvisor feedback of late (Image: Trip Advisor)
Read More
Related Articles
Read More
Related Articles
She also claimed that a "local loud mouth bloke" came across as a bully during her visit in January 2022.
"The staff appeared to be more interested in the local loud mouth bloke at the bar than other customers," the unimpressed northerner wrote. "I was horrified that he was allowed to shout out in from of the pub that he likes the chef, however his food is rubbish, and then as the chef was leaving he was throwing insults at him, in my opinion he was a bully."
Only 13 out of the 117 reviews were in the 'terrible' category (Image: Trip Advisor)
Read More
Related Articles
Another visitor, a local who visited in March last year, said: "Zero atmosphere and so many better pubs to see in Windsor". A third person took issue with the alleged lack of atmosphere, writing: "The pub needs good bar staff because since changing the name of the pub it has less atmosphere than the moon!"
However, only 13 out of the 117 reviews were in the 'terrible' category, while a respectable 47 were in 'excellent'. A decent 29 people thought it was 'very good' while 13 called it 'average' and six labelled it 'poor'. For the latest breaking news and stories from across the globe from the Daily Star, sign up for our newsletter by clicking here.
READ NEXT: